Psilocybe weilii: Identification, Habitat, Potency, and Taxonomic Status

Quick Facts: Psilocybe weilii Evidence Summary

How to read this table: “Protologue” denotes a claim traceable to the original formal description. “Secondary taxonomic literature” denotes subsequent revisions or reviews. “Field reports” include photographic observations and collector notes that have not been independently authenticated. Protologue-level and voucher-level evidence carry substantially greater taxonomic weight than field reports or anecdotal observations, and all values should be verified against primary sources before citation.

---

What Is Psilocybe weilii?

Direct answer (55 words): Psilocybe weilii is a historical name for a psilocybin-containing mushroom described from Georgia and named for physician Andrew Weil. It is associated with lawns, disturbed soil, red-clay landscapes, blue discoloration, farinaceous odor, and dark purplish-brown spores. Later taxonomy closely connects P. weilii with Psilocybe caerulescens, so current nomenclature should be verified before assigning independent species status.

Psilocybe weilii is a historical name applied to a psilocybin-producing mushroom formally described from Georgia by mycologists Gastón Guzmán, Fidel Tapia, and Paul Stamets. The species was named in honor of physician and integrative medicine advocate Andrew Weil, whose engagement with ethnomycology and psilocybin-containing fungi contributed to broader public and scientific awareness of the genus during the late twentieth century.

The name entered mycological literature at a time when field-based morphological taxonomy was the dominant framework for describing new Psilocybe taxa. Since then, molecular phylogenetics—particularly ITS sequencing and multi-locus analysis—has substantially reorganized the genus, as documented in studies such as Noordeloos (2011) and subsequent revisions, and subsequent taxonomic treatments have closely associated P. weilii with Psilocybe caerulescens, including synonymic and infraspecific interpretations. Researchers and naturalists should verify the current accepted treatment in MycoBank and Index Fungorum before using P. weilii as a taxonomically independent name.

Understanding this name therefore requires two parallel frameworks: the morphological and ecological profile established at original description, and the evolving molecular evidence that continues to reshape how closely related southern and subtropical Psilocybe taxa are circumscribed.

---

Current Accepted Taxonomy: Is Psilocybe weilii Still a Valid Species?

This is the most consequential unresolved question on this page, and it should be answered from primary sources rather than field-guide conventions.

What is currently known, in chronological order:

Original description. Guzmán, Tapia, and Stamets formally described Psilocybe weilii from Georgian collections, establishing a morphological species concept grounded in macroscopic and microscopic characters and placing the taxon within Psilocybe, family Hymenogastraceae, order Agaricales, division Basidiomycota. The protologue remains the authoritative baseline for any future nomenclatural treatment of the name.

Proposed relationship with P. caerulescens. Subsequent taxonomic treatments identified substantial morphological overlap between P. weilii and Psilocybe caerulescens, a neotropical species with records extending from Latin America into warm regions of the United States, as reviewed in Guzmán (1983). Some authorities proposed treating P. weilii as a variety—Psilocybe caerulescens var. weilii—or as a synonym, citing convergence in cap morphology, cyanescence, odor, spore deposit, and saprotrophic ecology on disturbed substrates.

Current database status. The accepted nomenclatural treatment should be verified directly in MycoBank and Index Fungorum with an explicit access date, as database records are updated as new evidence accumulates.

Molecular evidence. The multi-locus phylogenetic analysis needed to definitively resolve whether P. weilii represents a distinct lineage or a regional morphotype of P. caerulescens has not been comprehensively published. ITS sequencing of authenticated voucher material from Georgia’s Piedmont, submitted to GenBank and UNITE, would substantially advance this question.

Editorial note: This article treats P. weilii as a historically documented name with a defined morphological concept rather than as an unquestioned independent species. Where the current authoritative treatment differs from historical usage, that difference is stated explicitly. Readers using this name in scientific or formal contexts should resolve its current status before publication.

---

Psilocybe weilii vs. Psilocybe caerulescens: Comparison

Direct answer: Psilocybe weilii was originally described as a separate Georgia species. It shares a substantial suite of morphological, chemical, and ecological characters with Psilocybe caerulescens, and subsequent taxonomy has proposed synonymic or infraspecific relationships between them. Whether they represent one species or two cannot currently be resolved without comprehensive molecular evidence from authenticated vouchers across both taxa’s geographic ranges.

Key interpretive limitation: Characters shared by both taxa—hygrophanous cap, blue staining, farinaceous odor, dark purplish-brown spores—are widespread within Psilocybe and do not independently distinguish these taxa from each other or from related species. Differentiation, if demonstrable, will require microscopical character comparison against authenticated type material and molecular data.

---

Psilocybe weilii Identification

Direct answer (50 words): Historical Psilocybe weilii identification integrates a hygrophanous brown cap, blue discoloration on bruising, farinaceous odor, dark purplish-brown spore deposit, and Georgia provenance. None of these characters is independently diagnostic. High-confidence determination requires microscopic examination and, where authenticated reference sequences exist, molecular comparison.

Responsible identification of any psilocybin-containing mushroom requires integrating multiple independent lines of evidence. No single field character—not blue staining, not spore color, not odor—is sufficient to confirm a Psilocybe identification. The following characters are drawn from the original description and corroborating field literature and define the historical P. weilii concept.

Cap (Pileus)

The pileus is hygrophanous—changing color markedly with moisture content—typically medium to dark brown when wet, fading toward a paler buff or straw tone as the cap desiccates. This hygrophanous behavior is characteristic of the broader caerulescens group and reflects documented patterns across Psilocybe taxa placed within Hymenogastraceae. The precise anatomical basis of hygrophany in this taxon should be referenced against structural anatomical literature rather than attributed to a single simplified mechanism.

Cap shape transitions from broadly conical or campanulate in young specimens to broadly convex or plane at maturity, sometimes developing an umbo. Diameter in field-collected specimens falls within a moderate range consistent with other temperate Psilocybe taxa, though size varies considerably with substrate quality and ambient moisture.

Gills (Lamellae)

The lamellae are adnate to adnexed, moderately crowded, and pale in immature specimens, darkening to grayish-brown or purplish-brown as basidiospores mature. Gill edges appear paler than faces, consistent with the presence of differentiated cheilocystidia along the gill margin.

Stem (Stipe)

The stipe is slender, fibrous, and approximately equal in diameter, often with a slightly enlarged base. A fibrillose partial veil leaves an ephemeral annular zone that typically disappears in mature or handled specimens, making veil remnants an unreliable identification character under field conditions.

Blue Discoloration (Cyanescence)

Blue-green to blue-black discoloration following tissue damage is a defining characteristic of psilocybin-containing Psilocybe species. This cyanescence results from the enzymatic oxidation of psilocin upon oxygen exposure, a reaction characterized in Lenz et al. (2021), which demonstrated that psilocin oxidation and polymerization account for the blue pigmentation observed across cyanescent Psilocybe taxa. The reaction is chemically informative but not species-diagnostic: cyanescence occurs across dozens of Psilocybe taxa, varies in intensity with specimen age and handling, and cannot distinguish P. weilii from P. caerulescens or other bluing species in the southeastern United States.

Odor and Taste

Direct answer: P. weilii has been described as having a farinaceous odor, which some observers compare with raw flour, grain, or cucumber. Farinaceous odors occur in unrelated mushrooms—including some toxic Inocybe, a genus reviewed for odor characters in Matheny et al. (2020)—and human odor perception varies substantially among individuals, so smell provides descriptive context but cannot confirm or safely exclude a species.

Psilocybe weilii Spore Print

Direct answer: Descriptions of Psilocybe weilii report a dark purplish-brown spore deposit, consistent with the spore pigmentation documented across psilocybin-producing Psilocybe in Guzmán (1983). This supports placement within Psilocybe but cannot distinguish the historical P. weilii concept from P. caerulescens or many other Psilocybe species. Potentially toxic Galerina and Pholiotina generally produce browner or rustier deposits, but spore color alone is never a safety determination.

Microscopic Characters

Microscopic examination of the following structures is necessary to move beyond genus-level identification toward a historical P. weilii concept:

• Basidiospores: Broadly ellipsoid to rhomboid in face view, with a distinct germ pore, thick walls, and pigmentation consistent with the dark spore deposit, as characterized in the protologue and reviewed in Guzmán (1983).
• Cheilocystidia: Present along gill edges; neck shape and apex morphology are among the most taxonomically informative characters for distinguishing members of the caerulescens group.
• Pleurocystidia: Presence, absence, or morphological variation on gill faces contributes to species-level discrimination within Psilocybe, as discussed in the systematic treatments compiled in Guzmán (1983).
• Pileipellis: Hyphal arrangement consistent with the genus-level concept as documented across Psilocybe in Noordeloos (2011).

Safety limitation: Microscopy can strengthen a taxonomic determination but does not establish that an unknown wild mushroom is safe to consume. Neither microscopy nor this guide constitutes a safety determination for any wild specimen.

---

Psilocybe weilii Habitat and Ecology

Psilocybe weilii in Georgia Red Clay

Direct answer: Psilocybe weilii has frequently been reported from the red-clay Piedmont of Georgia, including lawns and disturbed ground in northern portions of the state. No controlled evidence establishes iron-rich Ultisols as an obligatory substrate. Georgia red clay is therefore a useful geographic and ecological association, not a diagnostic identification character or demonstrated physiological requirement.

Georgia’s Piedmont soils are classified largely as Ultisols by the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, characterized by high concentrations of iron oxides and aluminum oxides producing the regionally recognizable red-orange coloration and a moderately acidic pH profile. P. weilii has been repeatedly reported from lawns, disturbed ground, roadsides, and landscaped environments within this geological zone, often in association with Bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon), fescue, or decomposing organic debris near pine-hardwood forest margins. This habitat profile is consistent with a saprotrophic ecology dependent on decomposing plant material rather than mycorrhizal or dung-associated substrates.

The red-clay association most plausibly reflects the broad distribution of disturbed, organically enriched soils across Georgia’s Piedmont rather than a specific geochemical dependency, though controlled substrate experiments have not been published to confirm or exclude either interpretation.

Evidence-Graded Georgia Distribution

Source note: Voucher-level records can be searched in MyCoPortal and GBIF using Psilocybe weilii and relevant synonyms. All record counts and geographic extents in this table require an explicit access date and should be reverified before use.

Seasonality and Fruiting Conditions

Regional field reports most consistently place P. weilii fruiting in autumn, with some records extending into winter during mild years—a pattern correlated with declining temperatures following summer heat combined with sufficient soil moisture, consistent with seasonal fruiting ecology documented for related taxa across the southeastern United States. Spring fruiting has been reported but is less consistently documented for this taxon specifically.

These patterns align with the broader ecology of the caerulescens group, which generally favors cooler, moister conditions than the thermophilic Psilocybe cubensis—a dung-associated species with a fundamentally different ecological niche documented in Guzmán (1983).

Geographic Range

Authenticated records are concentrated in Georgia, with the greatest density of historical reports from northern portions of the state. Range assertions extending into adjacent southeastern states should be evaluated critically: without voucher specimens, herbarium deposits, or ITS-verified collections searchable in MyCoPortal and GBIF, geographic claims based on morphology alone remain provisional. The boundary between P. weilii and P. caerulescens distributions—if the two represent distinct taxa—has not been resolved by systematic molecular surveys.

---

Psilocybe weilii vs. Cubensis: Key Ecological and Morphological Differences

Direct answer: P. weilii and P. cubensis differ most clearly in ecology. P. cubensis is characteristically associated with herbivore dung in warm climates; historical P. weilii records emphasize Georgia lawns, disturbed soil, and organic debris. Both produce dark purplish-brown spores and blue-staining tissue, so those shared characters alone do not distinguish them.

Psilocybe cubensis is a coprophilous species fruiting on or near the feces of large herbivores—cattle, horses, buffalo—in warm, humid climates globally, associated with open pastureland and heavily grazed environments, as documented in Guzmán (1983). P. weilii, by contrast, is historically associated with a saprotrophic ecology on decomposing plant material in Georgia’s Piedmont—a fundamentally different substrate profile.

Morphologically, P. cubensis is substantially larger, produces a more prominent and persistent annulus, and presents a characteristic cap morphology that experienced observers distinguish readily from the smaller, more slender historical P. weilii concept. Habitat and substrate therefore provide the most practically useful initial separation in field conditions, alongside pronounced size and veil differences in mature specimens.

---

Psilocybe weilii Lookalikes and Safety Considerations

Direct answer: Small brown mushrooms in Georgia lawns and disturbed habitats include potentially toxic taxa—Galerina marginata, Pholiotina rugosa, and some Inocybe species. Cap color, blue staining, odor, habitat, or spore-print color cannot independently establish safety or species identity for any wild specimen.

The lookalike risk for P. weilii—as for all small, brown, lawn-inhabiting mushrooms—is significant and, in the case of amatoxin-producing species, potentially fatal. The following taxa share macromorphological features sufficient to cause misidentification by inexperienced observers.

Galerina marginata is the most dangerous lookalike in temperate North American habitats. A wood-associated saprotroph, G. marginata produces amatoxins—specifically α-amanitin—capable of causing fatal hepatorenal failure through RNA polymerase II inhibition, as detailed in Vetter (1998). It produces a brown cap, pale to brownish gills, an annulus, and a rusty-brown to brown spore print. One useful differentiating character is spore-print color—rusty brown in Galerina versus dark purplish-brown in Psilocybe—but this requires careful comparison under adequate lighting against reference material and cannot serve as a standalone safety test. Blue discoloration is absent in Galerina; however, absence of bluing in a damaged specimen is not definitive, since intensity varies with age, handling, and storage.

Pholiotina rugosa (synonym: Conocybe filaris) is a small, fragile, ring-bearing lawn mushroom also producing amatoxins, with poisoning cases documented in Beug et al. (2006). Its brown cap, slender stipe, and small annulus make it morphologically convergent with small Psilocybe in lawn habitats. Its spore print is rusty brown to cinnamon-brown rather than the dark purplish-brown of Psilocybe.

Inocybe species—a large and taxonomically complex genus revised in Matheny et al. (2020)—produce brown to gray-brown caps, fibrillose stipes, and farinaceous odors that overlap with the P. weilii odor profile. Toxicity within Inocybe varies substantially across the genus, ranging from muscarinic syndromes to other toxic presentations, as reviewed in Schäfer et al. (2021); not all species present equivalent risk, and the genus should not be characterized as uniformly fatal. Spore prints are typically brown without a violet component, and blue discoloration is absent—but these distinctions require careful observation, not casual field assessment.

The safety conclusion is unambiguous: No collection of small brown mushrooms from Georgia lawns or disturbed soil should be treated as positively identified based on field characters alone. If poisoning is suspected following ingestion of any unknown mushroom, contact Poison Control immediately (United States: 1-800-222-1222).

---

Psilocybe weilii Potency and Psilocybin Content

Direct answer: Psilocybe weilii is a psilocybin-producing taxon, but no universal potency percentage should be assigned without replicated chemical analyses of authenticated material. Quantitative claims should identify specimen authentication, sample size, analytical method, fresh- or dry-weight basis, and observed variation before being generalized to the historical taxon.

P. weilii is described as a psilocybin-containing species, and the tryptamine alkaloids responsible for its psychoactive effects—psilocybin, psilocin, and baeocystin—act primarily via agonism at serotonin 5-HT2A receptors, as established in Nichols (2016). Alkaloid concentrations in wild-collected Psilocybe vary substantially across collection sites, substrates, developmental stages, storage conditions, and individual specimens—even within a single confirmed species, as demonstrated by Beug and Bigwood (1982), who documented significant intraspecific variation in psilocybin and psilocin content across P. cubensis collections using HPLC analysis.

Quantitative potency claims circulating in popular sources for P. weilii specifically generally lack the analytical traceability required to evaluate them: they do not report specimen authentication method, analytical platform (HPLC, LC-MS, or otherwise), tissue basis (fresh versus dried weight), sample size, or measured variance. Without those parameters, a cited percentage is not a scientific finding—it is a number without a defined referent.

Minimum reporting standards for potency claims: authenticated taxon identity (voucher plus molecular evidence); analytical method with detection limits; tissue basis; sample size; and the full range of observed values, not a single representative figure.

---

Psilocybe weilii and Andrew Weil: The Naming Context

Direct answer: P. weilii was named for Andrew Weil, a Harvard-trained physician and prominent advocate for integrative medicine and evidence-informed exploration of psychoactive substances. The honorific reflects the intersection of institutional mycology and the late-twentieth-century revival of scientific interest in psilocybin-containing fungi. Honorific naming confers no taxonomic character; the species is defined entirely by its type specimen and formal description.

The practice of naming species for individuals—honorific nomenclature—is governed by the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants, which establishes that such names carry no taxonomic implication beyond the formal description to which they are attached. The choice of Andrew Weil as honoree by Guzmán, Tapia, and Stamets situates the formal description of this southern Psilocybe within a specific intellectual and cultural moment in North American mycology, at a point when interest in the genus was transitioning from primarily ethnobotanical documentation toward the chemical, pharmacological, and clinical investigation later reviewed in Nichols (2016).

---

Legal Status and Georgia Research Context

Federal law. Psilocybin and psilocin are Schedule I substances under the United States Controlled Substances Act, 21 U.S.C. § 812. Possession, collection, transfer, and use of Psilocybe weilii or any psilocybin-containing mushroom are subject to federal criminal penalties regardless of the specimen’s species identity, potency, or the collector’s intent.

Georgia state law. Georgia classifies psilocybin as a Schedule I controlled substance under the Georgia Controlled Substances Act, O.C.G.A. § 16-13-25. Relevant statutes should be verified against current legislative records at the Georgia General Assembly, as drug scheduling laws are subject to revision.

Research and spore law context. The legal status of Psilocybe spores—which do not contain psilocybin or psilocin as mature spores—varies by jurisdiction and is outside the scope of this article. Researchers intending to collect voucher specimens for herbarium deposit or molecular analysis should consult institutional legal counsel and relevant permitting requirements before field collection.

This article does not provide legal advice. Readers should consult a qualified attorney regarding the application of federal and state law to any specific situation.

---

How to Research and Document Psilocybe weilii Responsibly

Given the taxonomic uncertainty surrounding P. weilii, the contributions that would most meaningfully advance understanding of this name share a common framework: rigorous documentation rather than informal observation.

Voucher-quality collection standards:

• Fresh photographs of all morphological surfaces before and after handling, with scale reference
• Spore print prepared on both white and dark paper, photographed under consistent lighting
• Microscopic examination of spores and cystidia from fresh or properly preserved material, with measurements compared against protologue values
• Physical herbarium voucher deposited at a MyCoPortal-participating institution with complete label data
• ITS sequence submitted to GenBank and UNITE, linked to the voucher record

Records built on voucher-verified, sequence-confirmed collections will ultimately determine whether the P. weilii name retains species-level recognition or is formally absorbed into the P. caerulescens concept. Informal field reports—however detailed—cannot accomplish this nomenclatural resolution under the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants, and AI-assisted identification tools cannot substitute for the physical and molecular evidence that code requires.

---

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: What is Psilocybe weilii?

A: Psilocybe weilii is a historical name for a psilocybin-producing Psilocybe described from Georgia by Gastón Guzmán, Fidel Tapia, and Paul Stamets and named for Andrew Weil. Later taxonomy has closely associated the name with Psilocybe caerulescens, including synonymic or infraspecific treatments. Its current nomenclatural treatment should be verified in MycoBank and Index Fungorum before the name is used as an independent species.

Q: Is Psilocybe weilii still a valid species?

A: The current accepted treatment of P. weilii should be determined from MycoBank, Index Fungorum, and recent primary taxonomic literature with an explicit access date. Some authorities have proposed synonymy or infraspecific status relative to P. caerulescens; others have maintained it as distinct pending molecular evidence from GenBank and UNITE. The available molecular data are insufficient to resolve this question definitively as of the most recent literature search.

Q: Where does Psilocybe weilii grow?

A: Historical records and regional reports associate P. weilii strongly with Georgia—particularly lawns, disturbed soil, organic debris, and landscaped environments in northern portions of the state. Broader geographic claims should be supported by authenticated herbarium specimens searchable in MyCoPortal and GBIF rather than morphology-only field reports.

Q: Does Psilocybe weilii grow in Georgia red clay?

A: P. weilii has frequently been reported from Georgia red-clay Piedmont landscapes classified as Ultisols by the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. No controlled evidence establishes iron-rich Ultisols as an obligatory substrate. Red-clay occurrence is useful ecological context for identifying candidate habitats, not a species-level identification test or demonstrated physiological requirement.

Q: What does Psilocybe weilii smell like?

A: Published and field descriptions characterize the odor of P. weilii as farinaceous—comparable to raw grain, flour, or cucumber. Similar odors occur in unrelated and potentially toxic mushrooms including some Inocybe, as documented in Matheny et al. (2020), and odor perception varies substantially among individuals, so smell cannot confirm or safely exclude this taxon.

Q: What color is a Psilocybe weilii spore print?

A: Descriptions of P. weilii report a dark purplish-brown spore deposit, consistent with the spore pigmentation documented across psilocybin-producing Psilocybe in Guzmán (1983). This supports placement within Psilocybe but cannot independently distinguish the historical P. weilii concept from P. caerulescens or other related taxa. Spore-print color alone is never a safety determination.

Q: Is Psilocybe weilii the same as Psilocybe cubensis?

A: No. Psilocybe cubensis is a distinct taxon characteristically associated with herbivore dung in warm climates, as documented in Guzmán (1983). Historical P. weilii records are instead associated with Georgia lawns, disturbed soil, and organic debris—a fundamentally different ecological profile. Both produce dark purplish-brown spores and blue-staining tissue, so those characters alone do not distinguish them.

Q: How potent is Psilocybe weilii?

A: P. weilii is a psilocybin-containing taxon, but available evidence does not support assigning a universal potency percentage. Quantitative claims should come from authenticated specimens and report the analytical method, sample size, tissue basis, and measured variation, following the analytical standards demonstrated by Beug and Bigwood (1982). Popular sources omitting these parameters are not providing a scientifically traceable finding.

Q: Is Psilocybe weilii the same as Psilocybe caerulescens?

A: P. weilii was originally described as a separate Georgia species, but subsequent taxonomic treatments have closely associated it with P. caerulescens, including synonymic and infraspecific interpretations, as reviewed in Guzmán (1983). The accepted treatment should be determined from current MycoBank and Index Fungorum records rather than historical field-guide usage.

Q: Why was Psilocybe weilii named after Andrew Weil?

A: The species was named by Guzmán, Tapia, and Stamets in recognition of Andrew Weil’s documented influence on public and scientific interest in integrative medicine and psilocybin-containing fungi. Honorific naming in mycological taxonomy confers no taxonomic character, as established by the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants; the species is defined entirely by its type specimen and formal description.

---

Conclusion

Psilocybe weilii occupies a specific and instructive position in North American mycological history: a formally described, psilocybin-containing taxon from Georgia’s red-clay Piedmont, named for Andrew Weil, and now positioned at the taxonomic boundary between independent species status and synonymy with Psilocybe caerulescens. Its identification rests on an integrated suite of characters—hygrophanous brown cap, cyanescent tissue, farinaceous odor, dark purplish-brown spore deposit, and saprotrophic ecology in disturbed Georgia landscapes—none of which is independently diagnostic, and all of which require microscopic and ideally molecular corroboration before a determination can be considered credible.

The ecological association with Georgia red clay and northern Piedmont lawns is among the most distinctive features of the historical species concept, but it reflects a distributional pattern rather than a demonstrated geochemical dependency. The potency of P. weilii as a psilocybin-containing species is real; its precise quantification requires analytically rigorous sampling—reporting method, tissue basis, sample size, and variance as established in Beug and Bigwood (1982)—that current popular sources have not consistently provided.

The lookalike risk from Galerina marginata, Pholiotina rugosa, and muscarinic Inocybe species in lawn and disturbed-soil habitats is severe and well-documented in Vetter (1998), Beug et al. (2006), and Schäfer et al. (2021). No identification of P. weilii or any morphologically similar small brown mushroom should proceed without microscopic verification. Collection or possession of psilocybin-containing material carries significant legal consequences under federal law 21 U.S.C. § 812 and Georgia state law O.C.G.A. § 16-13-25.

For researchers, the P. weilii name is best treated as a historically anchored hypothesis awaiting molecular resolution. Voucher-verified, ITS-sequenced collections from Georgia’s Piedmont—deposited at accessible herbaria and linked to GenBank and UNITE accessions—would represent a genuine and citable contribution to the phylogeography of psilocybin-producing Psilocybe in the southeastern United States, and would give any future taxonomic treatment of this name in MycoBank and Index Fungorum a molecular foundation it currently lacks.